ArticleJMIR medical education2026
AI in UK Medical Education: A Framework for Curriculum Reform.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence readiness and its association with artificial intelligence literacy among Chinese medical students: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming health care through improvements in diagnosis, predictive analytics, and workflow optimization. However, there remains a significant gap in AI training within UK medical education, leaving future clinicians underprepared for AI-driven health care environments. This viewpoint paper investigated global best practices for AI integration into medical education and proposes a structured framework for embedding AI into the UK medical curriculum. It aimed to assess current attitudes, highlight existing knowledge gaps, and recommend practical implementation strategies. An analysis of international case studies (eg, Stanford University, the University of Toronto, and Chinese University of Hong Kong) was conducted alongside a review of teaching methodologies, stakeholder perspectives, and UK-based surveys to identify core competencies and challenges in AI education. Effective integration strategies include the use of AI-powered simulations, interdisciplinary collaboration, elective modules, and faculty training. Major barriers include lack of AI-literate educators, insufficient ethical training, and limited infrastructure. Knowledge gaps persist among students and faculty in areas such as algorithmic bias, AI ethics, and clinical decision-making. To meet the demands of modern health care, the UK medical curriculum must adopt comprehensive AI training. This includes practical exposure, ethical awareness, and stakeholder engagement. Proactive reform will ensure that graduates are equipped to critically and ethically apply AI tools in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.