ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
Digital Health Center App for Community and National Malaria Surveillance in Cambodia: Implementation Case Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: By 2015, the emergence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in the Greater Mekong Subregion threatened regional and global malaria control efforts. In response, Greater Mekong Subregion countries committed to malaria elimination by 2030, with strengthened surveillance as a strategic pillar. In 2017, Cambodia introduced an elimination-oriented digital Malaria Information System (MIS). Its health center app enables real-time, geo-located, case-based malaria reporting across primary health centers, and is fully integrated with the MIS. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the real-world national implementation of Cambodia's Android-based health center app, considering coverage, fidelity, timeliness, and data use, and their effects on malaria surveillance performance, case management, programmatic response, and public health outcomes. Methods: System performance and public health use were assessed using system-generated metadata, national surveillance data, and user surveys. Operational indicators included technical performance, data completeness, and reporting timeliness, alongside surveillance outcomes such as case notification, classification, reactive case detection, and foci investigation. Nationwide user experience was measured via a survey of 761 health centers across 21 provinces, with in-depth structured surveys at 9 health centers in 3 provinces. Descriptive analyses evaluated system functionality, contribution to malaria surveillance and response, and usability among frontline health workers. Results: The health center app demonstrated strong technical performance, with rapid loading and resilient data transmission under low-bandwidth conditions, supporting reliable reporting in resource-constrained settings. Integrated real-time dashboards provided analytics for case management, surveillance monitoring, risk stratification, and targeted public health interventions. Data completeness remained high (99%, 89/90 fields in 2024), demonstrating consistent routine use even as case incidence declined. Between January 1, 2025, and July 31, 2025, 69 malaria cases were reported nationally (23 locally acquired, 7 domestically imported, and 39 internationally imported). Of these, 95.7% (66/69) were notified and classified within 1 day. Reactive case detection was completed within 3 days for all 21 eligible cases, and 16 of 19 eligible foci received a response within 7 days, indicating strong operational responsiveness. User surveys showed 96.3% (733/761) of health centers were satisfied or very satisfied, 90.1% (686/761) reported rare or no technical issues, and 91.7% (698/761) found the app easy to navigate. Operational challenges included limited internet connectivity, transport to remote areas, and electricity interruptions. In-depth surveys confirmed high uptake, confidence in reporting, and routine use of surveillance data, although gaps in local analytical capacity were identified. Conclusions: Developed and managed locally to enhance sustainability, the MIS drove significant reductions in malaria case incidence, with the health center app contributing timely, complete, structured reporting at the point of care. Public health responses were facilitated by real-time analysis, targeted interventions, and decentralized decision-making. User engagement was sustained as malaria cases declined, and further enhancements are planned to ensure seamless transition to postelimination surveillance, reducing the risk of malaria reestablishment in Cambodia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.