ArticleJMIR AI2026
Knowledge-Augmented Large Language Model for Multimodal Electronic Health Record-Based Risk Prediction: Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate clinical outcome prediction using electronic health records (EHRs) is crucial for patient care and resource allocation. EHRs include both structured data and rich, unstructured clinical notes. However, prior machine learning methods struggle with the multimodality, long context of notes, and severe class imbalance in clinical tasks.
objectiveThis study aimed to introduce and evaluate KAMELEON (Knowledge-Augmented Multimodal EHR Learning for Outcome Prediction), a unified, 2-stage hybrid framework that integrates diverse EHR modalities and external biomedical knowledge to enhance clinical risk prediction.
methodsThis study used the publicly available, deidentified Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III dataset, which includes structured and unstructured data for over 40,000 intensive care unit patients. The 2 tasks studied were 30-day readmission (403/10,031, 4% positive rate) and in-hospital mortality prediction (2423/17,903, 13% positive rate). Train-test splits were patient-disjoint (80:20). Performance was evaluated against general and medical large language models (LLMs) and structured baselines. Key metrics included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and macro F
resultsThe KAMELEON framework consistently outperformed all existing baselines. 30-day readmission: the KAMELEON-balanced random forests model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 and a sensitivity (recall) of 0.79. Ablation analysis shows the critical role of the LLM-generated reasoning, with its removal causing the AUROC to drop from 0.85 to 0.7 and sensitivity to fall by over 80%. In-hospital mortality: the KAMELEON-extreme gradient boosting model achieved an AUROC of 0.92 and an AUPRC of 0.650. Unstructured-only models showed limited ability to discern mortality, with AUROC values near chance (around 0.51-0.53).
conclusionsTo our knowledge, KAMELEON represents one of the first systematic frameworks to enhance LLMs for health care prediction through graph-guided knowledge retrieval combined with structured machine learning. The framework demonstrates superior performance across both prediction tasks, highlighting the synergistic value of combining diverse data modalities and LLM reasoning for robust clinical risk estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.