Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42284506›Full record

ReviewJornal brasileiro de nefrologia

Current approaches to prescription and optimization of peritoneal dialysis: a practical review.

Thyago Proença de Moraes, Caio Pellizzari, Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins, Viviane Calice-Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thyago Proença de MoraesPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-3968
Caio PellizzariPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-5516
Paulo Ricardo Gessolo LinsUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1806-1285
Viviane Calice-SilvaFundação Pró-rim, Departamento de Pesquisa, Joinville, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9696-0529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an established form of kidney replacement therapy that offers patients the possibility of homebased treatment with significant flexibility and autonomy. Despite its advantages, many physicians in training and those just starting their clinical practice feel uncertain when prescribing PD, given the technical aspects, individualized adjustments, and the variety of modalities available. This manuscript provides a practical and didactic overview of how to prescribe PD, focusing on both continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). The discussion begins with the fundamental principles of solute and fluid transport, followed by step-by-step guidance on prescription elements such as dialysate volume, dwell time, number of exchanges, glucose concentration, and the use of icodextrin. Special attention is given to differences between CAPD and APD, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of clearance, ultrafiltration, and patient lifestyle. By combining theoretical background with clinical examples, this teaching resource aims to bridge the gap between guideline recommendations and bedside practice. Ultimately, the article seeks to empower clinicians to prescribe PD with confidence, improve patient-centered decision-making, and foster broader adoption of this therapy, which remains underutilized despite its well-documented clinical and social benefits.

Indexed as

Peritoneal DialysisDialysis SolutionsHumansIcodextrinPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryDialysis SolutionsIcodextrin

Identifiers

PMID42284506
PMCPMC13262985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.