ReviewJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
Current approaches to prescription and optimization of peritoneal dialysis: a practical review.
Review in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an established form of kidney replacement therapy that offers patients the possibility of homebased treatment with significant flexibility and autonomy. Despite its advantages, many physicians in training and those just starting their clinical practice feel uncertain when prescribing PD, given the technical aspects, individualized adjustments, and the variety of modalities available. This manuscript provides a practical and didactic overview of how to prescribe PD, focusing on both continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). The discussion begins with the fundamental principles of solute and fluid transport, followed by step-by-step guidance on prescription elements such as dialysate volume, dwell time, number of exchanges, glucose concentration, and the use of icodextrin. Special attention is given to differences between CAPD and APD, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of clearance, ultrafiltration, and patient lifestyle. By combining theoretical background with clinical examples, this teaching resource aims to bridge the gap between guideline recommendations and bedside practice. Ultimately, the article seeks to empower clinicians to prescribe PD with confidence, improve patient-centered decision-making, and foster broader adoption of this therapy, which remains underutilized despite its well-documented clinical and social benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.