ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Post-COVID-19 social determinants of health and quality of life: a longitudinal study.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo verify the association between the social determinants of health and quality of life domains in people in a post-COVID-19 condition.
methodsA longitudinal study was conducted with 179 people from the states of Ceará and Maranhão, followed for six months after a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Data collection was performed using a link for COVID-19 patients monitoring software, sent monthly via phone messaging app. Variables related to the social determinants of health and the domains of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessing quality of life are considered. Data analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsWomen showed improvements in the pain domain between the 2nd and 4th month (p = 0.038), vitality between the 4th and 6th month (p = 0.035), and mental health between the 2nd and 6th month (p = 0.005). Men showed better recovery in overall health status at 2 and 4 months (p = 0.029) and in social aspects at 2 and 6 months (p = 0.040).
conclusionProgressive improvement in quality of life was observed throughout the follow-up period, with differences between men and women in the areas of pain, vitality, mental health, general health status, and social aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.