ArticlePloS one2026
Who becomes a dermatologist? A repeated cross-sectional study on diversity in the Dutch dermatology workforce.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkforce diversity in dermatology is crucial for equitable, high-quality care, given the impact of skin tone, culture, and socio-economic status on skin conditions. Although this has been studied in other countries, data on the demographic makeup of Dutch dermatologists is lacking. This study aims to assess workforce diversity in Dutch dermatology over time.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide repeated cross-sectional study using pseudonymized microdata from Statistics Netherlands, including sex, migration background, and parental socio-economic indicators. Descriptive statistics were used to track demographic trends between 2005 and 2023, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate which variables influenced the odds that registered physicians in the 2023 national healthcare professional register (BIG register) had to be a dermatologist.
resultsFemale representation rose from 35.4% in 2005 to 61.7% in 2023. In 2023, 84.4% of dermatologists had no migration background or a European migration background. Dermatologists with Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, or Caribbean Dutch origins were underrepresented. Despite a net increase of 289 dermatologists, only 56 of this net increase consisted of dermatologists with a non-European background. Multivariable regression analysis showed that being female (OR 1.609 [1.143-2.266]), having parents in the top 20% assets bracket (OR 2.251 [1.272-3.984]), or having physician parents (OR 1.326 [1.011-1.740]) were associated with higher odds of being a registered dermatologist among the younger generation of physicians.
conclusionsThe findings highlight a persistent lack of ethnic and socio-economic diversity in the Dutch dermatology workforce, despite broader demographic shifts in the general population and medical student cohorts. The underrepresentation of dermatologists with a migration background may have implications for equitable patient care, particularly in the context of cultural and linguistic barriers, as well as differences in disease presentation across skin tones. Further research is warranted to explore the potential impact of workforce diversity on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.