Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42284359›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Phylogenetic based dissection of eukaryotic Mo-insertase functionality: From mechanism to complex assembly.

Tim Julian Schmidt, Ahmed H Hassan, Boas Pucker, Tobias Kruse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tim Julian SchmidtTU Braunschweig, Institute of Plant Biology, Braunschweig, Germany.
Ahmed H HassanCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-8877
Boas PuckerUniversity of Bonn, IZMB, Bonn, Germany.
Tobias KruseTU Braunschweig, Institute of Plant Biology, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-3227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molybdenum cofactor (Moco) biosynthesis is vitally important for all organisms, yet the domain organization of the eukaryotic molybdenum insertase (Mo-insertase) remains enigmatic. We combine extensive phylogenetic reconstructions, sequence analysis and structural modeling in order to uncover evolutionary and functional principles of eukaryotic Mo-insertases. We note, that the vast majority of plant, fungi and animal species evolved fused E- and G-domains, yet the orientation of both domains in the fusion proteins differs among different eukaryotic lineages. Despite the divergent domain arrangements amongst eukaryotic Mo-insertases the E-domain active site is well conserved, with very few tolerated substitutions. Among the Mo-insertases from different eukaryotic species, vertebrate gephyrin is the only Mo-insertase with a dual function as - next to its metabolic function - it scaffolds inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the post synapsis. Gephyrin is surprisingly high conserved, including surface patches not directly involved in catalysis and receptor clustering. This profile suggests additional, as yet uncharacterized, functional constraints on gephyrins evolution. Together, our results reveal how eukaryotic Mo-insertases combine evolutionary domain organization plasticity with stringent active site conservation and recognize the evolutionary constraint on gephyrin's surface conservation to be extreme, likely due to its mutual metabolic and neuronal function.

Indexed as

CoenzymesMembrane ProteinsMetalloproteinsPhylogenyAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCatalytic DomainEvolution, MolecularModels, MolecularMolybdenum CofactorsProtein DomainsPteridinesCoenzymesgephyrinMembrane ProteinsMetalloproteinsMolybdenum CofactorsmolybdopterinPteridines

Identifiers

PMID42284359
PMCPMC13262936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.