ArticlePloS one2026
Real-time detection of rare roadside obstacles using YOLOv8-n in autonomous vehicles.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare road obstacles, including traffic cones, fallen trees, debris, barrels, and rocks, pose significant safety risks to autonomous vehicles. This paper presents a lightweight real-time detection framework using YOLOv8-n to accurately identify such obstacles on resource-constrained hardware. Multiple open source datasets containing annotated images of rare objects were combined and curated into a unified dataset. The model was refined using transfer learning, and its resilience to changing illumination and partial occlusion was enhanced by data augmentation techniques such brightness fluctuation, rotation, flipping, and geometric distortion. On a mid-range NVIDIA P100 GPU, the model maintained an inference speed of 68 frames per second while achieving a precision of 95.4%, recall of 93.9%, F1-score of 94.6%, and mean average precision (mAP@0.5) of 98.1%. These findings show that the framework is appropriate for edge-based autonomous driving systems where low latency and computational efficiency are crucial since it provides precise real-time detection without the need for expensive hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.