ArticlePloS one2026
Cross-dataset benchmarking of machine learning models for marine and atmospheric environmental prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of marine and atmospheric environmental variables is important for climate adaptation, ecosystem management, and operational decision-making, yet practitioners still lack clear guidance on which machine-learning models are reliable across heterogeneous environmental tasks. We therefore developed a unified, leakage-aware benchmark across nine datasets, of which seven passed quality checks for modeling, spanning chlorophyll-a, wind speed, hydrographic observations, biotoxins, and bathymetry, and compared representative linear, tree-based, and sequence models under a common evaluation framework. Results show strong heterogeneity across tasks and model classes: tree ensembles are robust baselines for tabular problems, LSTM-based recurrent sequence modeling is most useful when temporal structure is central, and predictive skill depends more on target structure and covariate quality than on model complexity alone. Within the observational settings represented in this benchmark-predominantly Chinese coastal/estuarine and regional marine datasets, plus one atmospheric reanalysis wind task and one global cast archive-quality-controlled chlorophyll-a is comparatively predictable, whereas event-driven biotoxins and bathymetry inversion remain difficult under the current predictors. These findings provide practical guidance for researchers and environmental monitoring practitioners working in similar data regimes, but they should not be assumed to transfer automatically to untested regions such as the North Atlantic, the Mediterranean, or tropical open-ocean systems without further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.