ArticlePloS one2026
Time-to-event ensemble machine learning approach for predicting long-term survival of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is associated with risks such as endoleaks and late aneurysm rupture, highlighting the importance of long-term survival prediction. Despite recent advancements in machine learning (ML), predictive models utilizing time-to-event analysis remain limited for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. We aimed to develop a stacking ensemble ML model to predict long-term outcomes in EVAR-treated AAA patients.
methodsFrom 2002 to 2019, a total of 12,312 patients underwent EVAR. The primary outcome was AAA-related mortality, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. Using 5 ML algorithms, we developed a model comprising 34 variables. Model performance was assessed using the time-dependent C-index and Brier score. Variable importance was evaluated through permutation-based and partial dependent plots.
resultsThe stacking ensemble model showed the best predictive performance among the tested models (time-dependent C-index: 0.759 at 30 days, 0.716 at 365 days). The time-dependent Brier scores generally increased slightly over time but remained stable across all ML algorithms. Important predictors included age, smoking status, duration between diagnosis and surgery, household income, renal function, and blood pressure. Variable importance differed over time, and each predictor presented a nonlinear relationship with AAA-related mortality risk.
conclusionThe stacking ensemble ML model for time-to-event prediction identified dynamic, time-varying changes in predictor importance, providing improved risk stratification and phase-specific management after EVAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.