ArticlePloS one2026
Effects of tibialis anterior contraction on the medial longitudinal arch and hallux valgus angle: A functional anatomical perspective.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the effects of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle contraction on the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) and hallux valgus (HV) angle, primarily focusing on the potential functional role of the TA in foot alignment. Twenty-five healthy adults (mean age: 20.7 ± 1.0 years) participated. Electrical stimulation was applied to the TA without ankle dorsiflexion. A triaxial accelerometer was attached to the skin over the navicular bone, and electrogoniometers were placed over the interphalangeal joints of the hallux and ankle. The navicular displacement was calculated through double integration of the acceleration data. Contraction of the TA caused navicular displacement in the supination direction (upward, posterior, and medial), suggesting a temporary elevation of the MLA. The hallux showed an average varus shift of 1.36°; the shift was observed in 24 of 25 participants (p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between upward displacement of the navicular bone and the extent of varus change in the HV angle (r = 0.463, p = 0.020). Additionally, a greater initial HV angle was associated with a larger varus shift in the hallux after TA contraction (r = 0.433, p = 0.030). No significant correlations were observed between the HV angle change and ankle dorsiflexion, suggesting that the medial hallux shift may result from structural changes in the MLA rather than isolated joint motion. These findings provide novel evidence that TA contractions can elevate the MLA and induce varus displacement of the hallux. These findings further suggest that the TA contributes to foot biomechanics not only as an isolated muscle but also as part of a coordinated muscle system involved in arch dynamics and toe alignment. This suggests the potential clinical applications of TA activation in noninvasive interventions for mild-to-moderate HV, such as exercise therapy or neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.