ArticlePloS one2026
Beggar thy neighbour or befriend thy neighbour? Asymmetric spillovers of China's double world-class policy.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Higher education policies commonly engender certain spillover effects, which frequently remain unaccounted for within the formal policy evaluation framework. Focusing on China's Double World-Class (DWC) strategy, this paper investigates, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, whether and how the policy is associated with the research output of non-selected disciplines. Theoretically, this paper puts forward two possible causes of spillovers: reputation enhancement and resource dilution. Based on discipline-level empirical data in Chinese universities from 2014 to 2023 and combined with a panel-regression model, this paper examines whether this policy is associated with changes in the quantity and quality of research outputs among Chinese- and English-language publications across different areas. The results show that the World-Class Discipline (WCD) policy is associated with considerable asymmetric spillover effects on non-selected disciplines. This policy variable is associated with a reduction of 0.62% in the quantity and 1.77% in the quality of research outputs published in Chinese core journals in non-selected disciplines. Meanwhile, it is positively associated with an increase of 5.57% in quantity and 5.06% in quality of research outputs published in English journals. The results of mechanism tests indicate that the enhancement of university reputation and the dilution of educational resources play important roles in the asymmetric spillover effects of WCD policy. The heterogeneity analysis results show that the spillover effects of this policy change across different regions and disciplinary areas. Additionally, this paper integrates the Socialformation Paradigm theory and the Sustainable Social Development theory to further discuss the "delocalization" findings of WCD policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.