Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42284055›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

State Point-of-Sale Comprehensive Background Check Policies and County Firearm Homicide Rates.

Julia P Schleimer, Camerin A Rencken, Bradley H Wagenaar, Rose M C Kagawa, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia P SchleimerDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Camerin A RenckenDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Bradley H WagenaarDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Rose M C KagawaCenters for Violence Prevention, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Ali Rowhani-RahbarDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Background checks aim to prevent illegal firearm transfers. Existing research has shown little evidence for the effect of point-of-sale comprehensive background check (CBC) policies on firearm-related violence at the state level, but state-level estimates may mask local variation. Objective: To estimate the association between state-level point-of-sale CBC policies and county-level firearm homicide rates in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a difference-in-differences analysis with synthetic controls. Six US states that implemented a point-of-sale CBC policy between 2013 and 2019 and did not have a permit-to-purchase policy from 2000 to 2021 (Colorado, Delaware, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington) and 8 eligible control states that did not have a CBC or permit-to-purchase policy from 2000 to 2021 and were similar to treated states in terms of state partisanship (Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, and West Virginia) were included. The unit of analysis was county-years from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. Analyses were conducted from April 1, 2023, to December 15, 2025. Exposure: Implementation of point-of-sale CBC policies (that applied minimally to handguns) between July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual county-level firearm homicide rates per 100 000 population were directly standardized to the age (<5 years, 10-year age bands from 5-84 years, and ≥85 years) and sex (female or male) distribution of the US population in 2000. The synthetic control method was used to estimate counterfactual posttreatment means. Results: The study population included 750 counties: 59 from Colorado, 3 from Delaware, 33 from New Mexico, 36 from Oregon, 14 from Vermont, 39 from Washington, and 566 from states that did not have a CBC policy (ie, eligible controls). In unadjusted models, state-level CBC implementation was associated with a mean of -2.13 (95% CI, -3.19 to -1.04) firearm homicide deaths per 100 000 population across counties; after adjusting for covariates, a mean of 0.13 (95% CI, -0.88 to 1.13) deaths per 100 000 population were found. While there was some heterogeneity in county-specific estimates in adjusted models (with point estimates ranging from -13.2 to 20.5 deaths per 100 000 population), nearly all 95% CIs crossed the null. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of the association between state-level CBC policies and county-level firearm homicide rates assessed county-level heterogeneity that may have been masked in prior state-level studies. As in prior state-level studies, no associations were found for adjusted results. Findings suggest opportunities for further research on the design, implementation, and enforcement of CBC policies.

Indexed as

FirearmsHomicideCross-Sectional StudiesHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42284055
PMCPMC13263779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.