ArticleFamily medicine2026
Use of Preference Signals in Family Medicine Residency Recruitment.
Article in Family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preference Signaling in Family Medicine: Context Matters.Family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIncreases in graduate medical education application volume led to the introduction of preference signaling-a tool within the Electronic Residency Application Service that allows applicants to signal their sincere interest to a limited number of programs. This study aims to evaluate how family medicine program directors used preference signals during the 2023-2024 recruitment season, the first year this tool was available to family medicine programs. Understanding program director perspectives on preference signal utility is crucial for determining the tool's impact on the residency selection process.
methodsData were collected through the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance survey, which was distributed to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited US family medicine residency program directors and included questions on preference signaling. We performed statistical analysis using χ2 testing and multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between preference signal use and aspects of resident recruitment.
resultsThe overall response rate to the question set was 308/767 (40.2%). Program directors generally used preference signals as a component of holistic review, which did not supersede factors such as applicant rotation experiences and geographic location preferences as influential to application review. Overall, preference signals did not significantly influence interview offers or applicant ranking.
conclusionsPreference signals have been incorporated into the family medicine residency application review process but did not become a primary determinant in applicant selection during family medicine's first year of utilization. Traditional factors such as rotation performance and geographic preference remain highly influential. Further research is needed to optimize the use of preference signals in family medicine residency recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.