ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Religious Coping, Stress, and Mental and Physical Health: A Pooled Analysis Across Diverse US Cohorts in Studies on Stress, Spirituality, and Health (SSSH).
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upholding Human Dignity as a First Principle: Preventive Moral Injury Work in NATO Chaplaincy.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the association between perceived stress and mental/physical health (SF-12) and the moderating role of positive and negative religious coping using data (n = 5,059) from three cohorts (the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (n = 585), Nurses' Health Study II (n = 3,882), and The Strong Heart Study (n = 592)) which included Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic White, and American Indian individuals in the USA. By incorporating cohorts representing historically underserved racial and ethnic populations, this study contributes to the limited literature examining religious coping styles and stress across diverse groups. We examined the interaction between positive and negative religious coping and stress on mental/physical health, controlling for age, income, marital status, and education. Greater perceived stress was associated with poorer mental health [β = - 1.04 (- 1.37,- 0.7), p < 0.0001], but not worse physical health. Concerning moderation, positive religious coping attenuated [β = 0.23 (0.11, 0.35), p < 0.0001] and negative religious coping worsened [β = - 0.45 (- 0.88,- 0.02), p = 0.0034] the association between perceived stress and mental health in the combined analysis. Of note, patterns varied across cohorts, indicating that the role of religious coping style in shaping stress-health relationships may differ across cultural and religious contexts. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both positive and negative religious coping styles when examining psychosocial stress and mental health outcomes across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42284004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.