ReviewClinical drug investigation2026
Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Anti-amyloid Therapy: Clinical Implications of Kinetics for Safer Use and Risk Stratification.
Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies have emerged as disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease. However, their broader clinical adoption is limited by amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, a key safety concern. Traditionally viewed as an unavoidable and dose-dependent adverse effect, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities often lead to treatment interruption or the exclusion of high-risk patients from therapy. Emerging evidence now suggests that amyloid-related imaging abnormalities may instead reflect a transient modifiable cerebrovascular response, primarily influenced by the kinetics of amyloid clearance rather than the absolute magnitude of amyloid removal. Recent data from titration-based dosing strategies demonstrate that gradual amyloid mobilization can significantly reduce the incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities without compromising amyloid positron emission tomography responses or downstream biomarkers. This kinetic perspective may support a more nuanced re-evaluation of patient groups previously deemed unsuitable for therapy, including APOE ε4 carriers, individuals with cerebral microbleeds, and patients on antithrombotic treatment. In this Current Opinion, we propose a pragmatic clinical framework that integrates amyloid clearance kinetics, magnetic resonance imaging-based risk stratification, and individualized protocols for treatment interruption and re-challenge. By reframing amyloid-related imaging abnormalities as a modifiable clinical decision-making challenge rather than an inherent toxicity, anti-amyloid therapies may be optimized for safer use; however, whether such approaches can enable broader and more inclusive treatment strategies remains to be established in prospective studies, particularly in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42283996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.