ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Gaps in patient-reported outcome measures integration into the management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): qualitative insights for implementation strategies.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to monitor lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). However, there is limited evidence on patients' perspectives on integrating PROMs into clinical practice and on best practices to improve their implementation to better meet patient needs. The aim of this study is to explore patients' experiences completing PROMs during routine BPH management, and to develop patient-informed strategies for PROM implementation in urologic care. METHODOLOGY: Virtual semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with English-speaking patients aged 50 years or older with BPH who attended outpatient urology clinics between May and October 2025. Patients were purposively sampled based on the type of treatment received (medical or surgical). Interview data were analyzed using interpretive description. Themes were synthesized inductively, and practical implementation strategies were developed from participants' suggestions.
resultsTwenty patients participated (12 received medical treatment and 8 received surgical treatment). Four themes emerged regarding patient perspectives on PROM use in routine care: (1) Perceived benefits-patients viewed PROMs as valuable tools for tracking symptom progression, prompting self-reflection, and facilitating communication among the clinical care team; (2) Questionnaire content-patients questioned the relevance of specific domains, particularly the non-specificity of the PROMIS pain scales as well as mental health, and sexual health items; (3) Perceived barriers-participants criticized the excessive volume of questionnaires; and (4) Considerations for PROM Integration-participants emphasized the importance of visible follow-up actions based on PROM results. Practical recommendations for PROM integration in routine clinical practice included: (1) enhancing patient understanding of PROMs by providing a brief rationale prior to survey administration; (2) implementing a patient-preference PROM workflow in the electronic health record (EHR); and (3) providing tangible actions based on PROM results, such as summarizing scores in plain language and incorporating results into discussions during visits.
conclusionsThis study provides patient-informed insights into the implementation of a broad PROM battery in LUTS/BPH care. Participants emphasized that PROMs are more acceptable when their purpose is clearly explained and when responses are visibly discussed or acted upon in care. Future research should examine how these patient-informed strategies can be operationalized within clinical workflows and integrated with clinician, administrator, and EHR perspectives to support sustainable PROM use in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.