ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Social inequalities in return-to-work among colorectal cancer survivors in Germany.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor working-age patients with colorectal cancer, returning to work is a key rehabilitation goal. This study examines the association between socio-economic position (SEP) and return-to-work (RTW), including competing outcomes (pension entry and death), following medical rehabilitation.
methodsGerman Pension Insurance data (2013-2022) were analysed, including 32,174 formerly employed patients (ICD-10 C18-C20) of working age undergoing oncological rehabilitation. Patients were categorised by SEP (education, occupational position, income). Logistic regression and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analyses investigated socio-economic differences in RTW, unemployment, sick leave, pension, and death.
resultsFollowing rehabilitation, 31% of patients returned to work in the first month, and by 2 years, 65% had experienced a long-term RTW lasting ≥ 6 months. SEP was significantly associated with both initial and long-term RTW. The strongest associations were observed for income (long-term RTW highest vs. lowest income tertile: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.06; 95% CI 2.84-3.31) and university education (long-term RTW ISCED‑2011 levels 5-8 vs. 1-3: aOR 2.20; 95% CI 1.94-2.50). RMST showed that patients with higher SEP spent more time in employment and less time unemployed or receiving disability pension than those with lower SEP. The employment time lost between the highest and lowest SEP levels was 8 months for education, 8 months for occupational position, and 10 months for income.
conclusionsFifty-eight percent of patients with colorectal cancer were stably employed 2 years after medical rehabilitation. However, despite universal access to rehabilitation in Germany, strong social inequalities in RTW were observed. Monthly employment and pension data allowed reliable estimates, preventing selective non-response and recall bias. However, the results might not generalise to those who do not undergo rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.