Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283906›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2026

Spiking neural models for decision-making tasks with learning.

Sophie Jaffard, Giulia Mezzadri, Patricia Reynaud-Bouret, Etienne Tanré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie JaffardCenter for Systems Biology Dresden, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. jaffard@mpi-cbg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4392-631X
Giulia MezzadriCentre Borelli, École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6453-9070
Patricia Reynaud-BouretLaboratoire J. A. Dieudonné, CNRS, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3054-1137
Etienne TanréUniversité Côte D'Azur, Inria, CNRS, LJAD, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2214-5828

Funding

National Research Agency ANR-15 IDEX-01National Research Agency ANR-19-CE40-0024-02National Research Agency ANR-19-P3IA-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cognition, response times and choices in decision-making tasks are commonly modeled using Drift Diffusion Models (DDMs), which describe the accumulation of evidence for a decision as a stochastic process, specifically a Brownian motion, with the drift rate reflecting the strength of the evidence. In the same vein, the Poisson counter model describes the accumulation of evidence as discrete events whose counts over time are modeled as Poisson processes. This model has a spiking neurons interpretation as these processes are used to model neuronal activities. However, these models lack a learning mechanism and are limited to tasks where participants have prior knowledge of the categories. To bridge the gap between cognitive and biological models, we propose a biologically plausible Spiking Neural Network (SNN) model for decision-making that incorporates a learning mechanism and whose neurons activities are modeled by a multivariate Hawkes process. First, we show a coupling result between the DDM and the Poisson counter model, establishing that these two models provide similar categorizations and reaction times and that the DDM can be approximated by spiking Poisson neurons. To go further, we show that a particular DDM with correlated noise can be derived from a Hawkes network of spiking neurons governed by a local learning rule. In addition, we designed an online categorization task to evaluate the model predictions. This work provides a significant step toward integrating biologically relevant neural mechanisms into cognitive models, fostering a deeper understanding of the relationship between neural activity and behavior.

Indexed as

Decision MakingLearningModels, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsCognitionComputer SimulationHumansMathematical ConceptsNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsPoisson DistributionReaction TimeStochastic ProcessesDecision-makingDrift diffusion modelHawkes processLocal learning ruleSpiking Neural Network

Identifiers

PMID42283906
PMCPMC13263290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.