ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Age-specific patterns of lymph node involvement in elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAge-related alterations in lymphatic and immune function may influence nodal disease patterns in elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This study aimed to evaluate the association between chronological age and lymph node metastasis (LNM) and to assess whether the lymph node ratio (LNR) retains prognostic relevance for overall survival (OS) across different elderly age groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 363 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent primary surgical treatment for OSCC. Age was analyzed both as predefined age groups and as a continuous variable using natural cubic spline modeling. Associations between age and LNM were examined using logistic regression. The impact of age and LNR on OS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models, supplemented by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses.
resultsChronological age showed no significant linear association with LNM, while spline analyses indicated only a weak non-linear relationship. Higher comorbidity burden was inversely associated with LNM. LNR was not correlated with age and showed comparable distributions across elderly age strata. In survival analyses, LNR demonstrated a strong non-linear association with OS, whereas age exerted only a modest effect. Overall survival did not differ significantly between elderly age groups.
conclusionsChronological age alone was not a major determinant of nodal involvement or survival in elderly OSCC patients. LNR remained a robust prognostic indicator independent of age. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LNR may aid in risk stratification and postoperative decision-making in elderly OSCC patients, supporting individualized oncologic management beyond chronological age alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.