ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Breeding objectives and trait prioritization in indigenous goat systems: insights from South African smallholders.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defining farmer-driven breeding objectives is essential for designing community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) that improve productivity and sustainability of indigenous goats. This study investigated herd structures, management practices, and trait preferences of 240 smallholder households keeping Xhosa goats across three agro-ecological zones (Savanna, Nama Karoo, and Grassland) in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Structured questionnaires were administered, and data analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ranking indices, and K-means cluster analysis. Results showed that goat ownership was predominantly male-headed (68%), with average herd sizes of 21.4 ± 5.7 goats. Breeding does comprised 54% of herds, while buck ownership was low (27%), raising concerns of inbreeding. The main reasons for keeping goats differed significantly across zones (χ² = 18.42, p = 0.016), with cultural uses ranked highest in Savanna, while meat and investment dominated in Nama Karoo and Grassland. Culling was primarily due to poor reproduction (31%), old age (26%), and disease (22%). Cluster analysis identified three typologies of goat keepers, traditional (41%), semi-modern (35%), and commercial-oriented (24%), that differed significantly in herd size (p < 0.01), mating control (p < 0.05), and trait prioritization. Trait ranking revealed that farmers prioritized fertility (Index = 0.241; Rank 1), maternal ability (0.192; Rank 2), and twinning ability (0.175; Rank 3) for does, while overall health (0.181; Rank 1), testes size (0.150; Rank 2), and reproductive soundness (0.156; Rank 1 in Ngqwara) were most important for bucks. Aesthetic traits such as coat colour (0.091-0.114) and horns (0.118) were consistently ranked lowest. This study demonstrates that farmers in communal systems emphasize reproductive, maternal, and adaptive traits over appearance or record-based criteria when selecting breeding stock. Aligning CBBPs with these farmer-defined priorities, while progressively integrating pedigree and performance data, is crucial for sustainable genetic improvement and resilience of indigenous goat populations in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.