Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283853›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2026

[Non-invasive neuromodulation for chronic pain : A review of eight current methods and the evidence].

Luisa Gallasch, Kati Thieme

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luisa GallaschInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl von Frisch Str. 4, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland.
Kati ThiemeInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl von Frisch Str. 4, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland. Kati.Thieme@uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review summarizes the clinical evidence of non-invasive neuromodulation (NINM) in selected chronic pain conditions and examines whether combining neuromodulation with behavioral or psychological pain therapy improves therapeutic outcomes.

methodsClinical studies and meta-analyses investigating NINM in neuropathic pain, migraine, fibromyalgia, and chronic low back pain were reviewed. Particular attention was given to studies integrating neuromodulation with active physiotherapy or psychological pain therapy.

resultsThe strongest evidence exists for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which demonstrate moderate effects in neuropathic pain, migraine, and fibromyalgia. Other approaches such as cranial electrical stimulation (CES), neurofeedback, and systolic extinction training (SET) show promising but more limited evidence. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is only effective for acute back pain. Across conditions, neuromodulation alone often produces short-term improvements in pain, whereas multimodal interventions combining neuromodulation with behavioral therapy such as neurofeedback and SET appear to produce clinically significant pain reduction and remission. DISCUSSION: A potential explanation for these findings lies in the interaction between neuromodulation and learning processes. Neuromodulatory interventions may transiently increase neural plasticity within the pain network. The reactivation of the brain stem (dorsal-medial nucleus tractus solitarius; dmNTS) might create a window during which adaptive learning processes can be facilitated. Behavioral interventions such as operant pain therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy can reinforce healthy behaviors and adaptive coping through mechanisms of classical and operant conditioning.

conclusionNINM should be considered not only as an isolated intervention but also as a neurophysiological facilitator of learning-based pain therapy. Future research should focus on personalized neuromodulation protocols, multimodal treatment approaches, and the identification of neurophysiological biomarkers that predict treatment response.

Indexed as

Chronic PainElectric Stimulation TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineCombined Modality TherapyFibromyalgiaHumansMigraine DisordersNeurofeedbackNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationCranial electrical stimulationNeurofeedbackRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSystolic extinction trainingTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.