Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283751›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2026

Standardized MRI nomenclature for knee meniscal lesions: SSR consensus panel report.

Jie C Nguyen, Tetyana Gorbachova, Dyan V Flores, Bethany U Casagranda, Majid Chalian, Kimia K Kani, Megan K Mills, Ogonna Kenechi Nwawka, Kevin G Shea, Kurt P Spindler and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jie C NguyenDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tetyana GorbachovaDepartment of Radiology, Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dyan V FloresDepartment of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Bethany U CasagrandaDepartment of Radiology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Majid ChalianDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kimia K KaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Megan K MillsDepartment of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ogonna Kenechi NwawkaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin G SheaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kurt P SpindlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kathryn J StevensDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jennifer S WeaverDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Adam C ZogaDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Jefferson, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert D BoutinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. boutin@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7887-9658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess nomenclature variability and develop recommendations on standardized MRI reporting of meniscal findings.

methodsThe Society of Skeletal Radiology identified standardized MRI reporting of knee menisci as an important topic for study and invited all members to serve on a panel to provide consensus recommendations. The Society empaneled 12 musculoskeletal radiologists and 2 orthopaedic surgeons. The panel reviewed published literature (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using predetermined criteria for inclusion (peer-reviewed, English-language, human studies) and exclusion (case reports, conference abstracts, book chapters, expert opinions, and commentaries). Literature analysis focused on nomenclature relevant to MRI reporting in two general domains: (I) meniscal anatomy and anatomic variants and (II) meniscal tears and associated findings.

resultsSubstantial nomenclature variability was identified across both domains. For anatomy and variants, inconsistencies involved root zone definitions, vascular zone descriptors, perimeniscal stabilizer terminology (including eponyms), and diagnostic criteria for the discoid meniscus. For tears and associated findings, variability involved numerical grading systems, the terms "complete" and "incomplete," extrusion measurement methodology, and interpretive labels (e.g., "traumatic," "degenerative," "repairable," "stable"). Ten consensus recommendations for standardized MRI reporting were developed.

conclusionDescriptive anatomic language-specifying what is seen and where-can be more reproducible and clinically actionable than reporting variable numerical grades and evolving classifications. Adoption of our ten pragmatic recommendations has the potential to reduce miscommunication, improve inter-institutional consistency, and support clinical research.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMenisci, TibialTerminology as TopicTibial Meniscus InjuriesHumansSocieties, MedicalConsensusKneeMeniscusMRINomenclature

Identifiers

PMID42283751
PMCPMC13424353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.