ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Changes of Tissue Reactions on Various HA Filler Under Immune Stress Status: An In Vivo Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-COVID-19, there has been an increase in reports of anaphylaxis to hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injections.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the differences in tissue reactions induced by HA fillers produced via various cross-linking technologies under conditions of immune stress.
methodsA sensitized guinea pig model was utilized to evaluate the anaphylactic responses to different HA fillers. The biological reactions at the injection sites were assessed through hematoxylin and eosin staining. Material properties of the HA fillers were characterized using rheological testing.
resultsUpon injection into sensitized guinea pigs, anaphylactic reactions varied in intensity. The probability of anaphylaxis increased with the degree of cross-linking in the HA fillers, with the reactions predominantly localized to the intradermal injection sites. Histopathological analysis revealed varying degrees of lymphocyte infiltration and other pathological changes across the experimental groups. HA gels produced using different technologies exhibited distinct rheological properties.
conclusionThe degree of cross-linking and the manufacturing technologies employed in the production of HA fillers significantly impact the occurrence of clinical reactions during immune stimulation. These findings suggest that the administration of HA fillers should be meticulously contemplated in the context of immune stress. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.