ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Second Primary Malignancy Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Receiving CAR T-cell Therapy or Other Systemic Anticancer Treatments: A Real-World Comparative Study.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to compare the risk of second primary malignancy (SPM) between patients with multiple myeloma who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy versus other systemic anticancer therapies (SACT). EXPERIMENTAL
designAdult patients with multiple myeloma who initiated CAR T therapy or other SACT were identified from Komodo Health claims data and weighted to balance baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence of SPM was estimated over 24 months, and P values were calculated for the difference between 0 and 24 months.
resultsThe study included 435 patients who received CAR T therapy and 12,268 patients who received other SACT (median follow-up, 11.8 months). Compared with other SACT, CAR T therapy was associated with similar risks of any SPM (at 24 months, 24.1% vs. 22.3%; P0-24 months = 0.31) and solid SPM (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P0-24 months = 0.32) but significantly higher risk of hematologic SPM (17.9% vs. 13.1%, P0-24 months = 0.04). In a sensitivity analysis requiring ≥ 2 claims to identify an SPM, difference in hematologic SPM risk was attenuated (5.5% vs. 4.9%, P0-24 months = 0.08). Notably, bone marrow examinations were more common after CAR T therapy (e.g., 47% vs. 13% at 0-3 months).
conclusionsIn this real-world dataset with relatively short follow-up, patients with multiple myeloma seemed to have a higher risk of hematologic SPM after CAR T therapy compared with other SACT. However, misclassification and detection bias cannot be ruled out. The association warrants further evaluation. Physicians should be vigilant for myeloid malignancies after CAR T therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.