ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Cardiogenic Shock Following Sewing Needle Aspiration.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracardiac foreign bodies are rare but may cause life-threatening complications, including cardiac tamponade and cardiogenic shock. CASE SUMMARY: A 54-year-old man presented with acute chest pain, hypotension, and sinus tachycardia concerning for cardiogenic shock. Coronary angiography was normal. Computed tomography angiography performed for suspected pulmonary embolism revealed a moderate pericardial effusion and a linear metallic foreign body extending from the left hepatic lobe through the diaphragm into the pericardium with right ventricular penetration. The patient underwent urgent subxiphoid pericardial window with relief of tamponade followed by exploratory laparotomy and removal of a sewing needle. He later recalled accidental ingestion. He recovered fully and was discharged on postoperative day 6. DISCUSSION: This unusual case highlights the need to consider foreign body injury in unexplained tamponade and to use multimodality imaging for diagnosis. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Atypical presentation without prior medical conditions should prompt a thorough social history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.