ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Pacemaker Implantation in Persistent Left-Sided Superior Vena Cava: Challenges and Strategies.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent left-sided superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital venous anomaly that may make cardiac device implantation challenging, particularly when implanting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. This anomaly is often recognized incidentally intraoperatively and may significantly influence the procedural strategy and outcomes. We present a case series of 3 patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation in whom PLSVC was unexpectedly present. The first case involved a patient with PLSVC and absent right superior vena cava (SVC) in whom a dual-chamber pacemaker was successfully implanted from the right side via the left SVC. The second case involved a CRT implantation in a patient with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, aneurysmal PLSVC, and a coronary sinus that precluded lead placement necessitating a change in strategy to conduction system pacing from the right side. The third case involved a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy in whom successful CRT implantation was achieved through the left SVC using modified catheters and guide techniques. In conclusion, persistent left-sided SVC sometimes presents a unique technical challenge during pacemaker implantation. Successful procedural outcome depends on early recognition, flexible procedural planning, and familiarity with alternative venous access and pacing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.