ArticleCritical care explorations2026
Multiagent First-Person Perspective Analysis for Leadership Assessment in Pediatric Emergency Simulations: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional leadership assessments provide structured ratings but offer limited observer-independent metrics. Because leadership and teamwork are interdependent, capturing team dynamics requires multiagent, time- and space-synchronized analysis. This pilot study examined the feasibility of applying multiagent, spatiotemporally synchronized first-person perspective analysis (FPA) in emergency simulations.
methodsThis exploratory simulation study was conducted in a real patient-care room within the PICU of our institution. Two physicians-a critical care specialist (L1) and a pediatric resident (L2)-each completed one scenario as team leader. Leadership behaviors were evaluated using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale, focusing on Situational Awareness and Communication. Wearable smart glasses recorded first-person video and gaze data, enabling identification of fixations within five predefined areas ("patient," "member," "device," "screen," and "unknown"). Eye-contact events were quantified using face detection based on You Only Look Once, version 8, a deep learning-based object detection model, combined with gaze-vector estimation, and analyzed in relation to the timing of verbal communication.
resultsMultiagent, time-synchronized FPA was implemented without device- or software-related interruption, and no critical data loss occurred. The mean analyzable session duration relative to total operating time was 77.1%, and the mean percentage of frames excluded from object tracking was 29.3%, primarily due to target objects being outside the field of view. As secondary, illustrative findings, Ottawa Global Rating Scale scores indicated that both leaders were rated within the competent range. FPA further showed that both leaders spent approximately 80% of the scenario fixating on predefined relevant areas (L1: 599/731 s; L2: 565/693 s). Greater patient-directed fixation and balanced gaze transitions were observed in L1, whereas L2 showed prolonged fixation within nonspecific areas. L1 also established eye contact with team members more frequently during direct orders or information sharing.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of multiagent, time-synchronized FPA for extracting gaze-based behavioral information relevant to leadership assessment in emergency simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.