ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026
Accurate Sizing and Resolution of Nominal 200 nm Diameter Polystyrene Nanospheres With Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of Intact MDa Poly(A)-Tailed and Non-Tailed mRNA Fractions with Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Contact Electrification of Individual Water Microdroplets Inside Mass Spectrometers Leads to Extensive Oxidation or Reduction Irrespective of Initial Droplet Charge or Polarity.ACS central science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) with electrostatic ion traps has been used to characterize the mass distributions of a variety of nanoparticles that have masses ranging from ∼1 to 400 megadaltons (MDa). Here, samples of polystyrene nanospheres from three different manufacturers with diameters ∼200 nm and masses of several gigadaltons (GDa) were characterized by both CDMS and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). From the centroid masses of ∼2.320, ∼2.602, and ∼2.897 GDa, centroid diameters of 191.4, 199.1, and 204.8 nm were obtained, respectively. These diameters are within 1% of those obtained from TEM measurements. The size distributions of the individual components in a mixture of these three samples were readily resolved with CDMS but not with TEM. The greater measurement time required for a statistically meaningful measurement from TEM led to some particle shrinkage that was not uniform between particles. The width of the most monodisperse nanoparticle sample distribution indicates that CDMS could distinguish two nanoparticle samples that differed by just 2 nm in diameter at this particle size (1%). The high resolution, minimal sample preparation requirements, compatibility with automation, and now extended mass range make CDMS a powerful high-throughput nanoparticle characterization tool for nanoparticles in biomedicine, advanced electronics, and material science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.