ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
A case-based bioprospecting ethics module for undergraduate CUREs with multi-institution evidence of student learning.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioprospecting, the search for useful biological resources, drives scientific innovation but can be tarnished by ethical challenges (e.g., biopiracy) when prior informed consent and benefit sharing are not formally established. Despite the widespread use of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) with a foundation in characterizing biodiversity and, in many cases, direct bioprospecting, to our knowledge, there are no published CURE curricula that teach the ethics of bioprospecting. Here we developed and vetted the Bioprospecting Module as a flexible, case-based curricular resource that can be implemented before students commence discovery-based research. The resource is focused on learning and analysis situations that warrant prior informed consent and mutually agreed terms and is adaptable to other science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) courses that incorporate ethics. The module was implemented across 13 collegiate institutions with undergraduate students enrolled in a Tiny Earth CURE at diverse course types and institutional contexts. Student learning was evaluated using iteratively refined pre-post knowledge-based instruments aligned to learning objectives. Student perception and attitudinal measures were also surveyed to complement the knowledge measures. Throughout classroom implementation, students showed significant pre-post learning gains with a large effect size. Post-module performance was comparable across student groups and institutional contexts after accounting for baseline knowledge. Furthermore, ceiling effects were observed with higher pre-scores but did not undermine overall gains. Students reported increased perceived competence in module learning objectives and positive engagement with the module. This adaptable module provides a scalable curricular resource for embedding ethical bioprospecting and responsible and ethical conduct of research in STEM courses, helping students anticipate and navigate consent, benefit sharing, and stewardship issues in research fueling the bioeconomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.