ReviewPest management science2026
Microbiome-mediated chemical communication in insects: Implications for pest management.
Review in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insects rely on semiochemicals to regulate aggregation, mating, foraging, and host selection. This review synthesizes evidence that insect-associated microbiota shape these chemical signals and evaluates their potential for pest management. The literature supports four principal routes by which microbes influence insect chemical communication: (i) direct production of volatile organic compounds; (ii) microbial provision or modification of pheromone precursors; (iii) microbiome-mediated effects on sensory and neural function; and (iv) context dependence driven by diet, development, quorum sensing, and environmental microbiomes. The strongest evidence comes from loss-gain-rescue studies, including German cockroach fecal volatiles and Wolbachia-linked effects on Drosophila paulistorum mating chemistry. Translationally, fermentation-based lures for fruit flies and microbial deterrents such as Xenorhabdus-derived metabolites show clear promise, whereas most other systems remain correlative because gene-to-metabolite-to-behavior chains are incomplete and field validation is limited. Microbiome-semiochemical interactions offer a credible platform for next-generation attractants, repellents, and symbiont-based pest control. Progress will depend on rigorous mechanistic validation, standardized behavioral assays, and biosafety-aware field testing to convert promising discoveries into scalable integrated pest management tools. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.