Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283203›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2026

Baseline Function Predicts Gains in Both Speech Recognition and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation.

Andrew L S Thornton, Barak Spector, Natalie Schauwecker, Jessica H Lewis, Terrin N Tamati, Theodore R McRackan, Aaron C Moberly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew L S ThorntonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0009-0001-0989-5870
Barak SpectorDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Natalie SchauweckerMichigan Ear Institute, Novi, MI.
Jessica H LewisDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Terrin N TamatiDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Theodore R McRackanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Aaron C MoberlyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Predicting Speech Recognition in Adults Receiving Cochlear ImplantsR01DC019088 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOBERLY, AARON C · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Social Networks for Optimizing Communication Ability in Adult Cochlear Implant UsersR01AG089200 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Terrin Nichole Tamati · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Beyond Clinical Measures: Auditory-Social Experience and Robust Communication Skills in Adults Following Cochlear ImplantationR21DC019382 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMATI, TERRIN NICHOLE · 2022 to 2024
$634k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089200NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019088NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC019382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize patterns of improvement in speech recognition and quality of life (QOL) after cochlear implantation and examine how baseline performance, device use, and candidacy status ("borderline," qualifying in noise only vs. "traditional," qualifying in quiet) predict postoperative gains in both domains. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingTertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred one adult unilateral CI recipients implanted between 2019 and 2023 with complete preoperative and postoperative (6 or 12 mo) speech recognition and QOL data.

interventionsUnilateral cochlear implantation.

main outcome measuresAzBio sentence recognition in quiet (AzBioQ) and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Global scores. Clinically meaningful improvement was defined using validated thresholds for each measure.

resultsOf 101 patients, 97 demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in at least one domain: 44 improved in both speech recognition and QOL (dual improvers), 43 in speech recognition only, 10 in QOL-only, and 4 showed no significant improvements. Patients with lower baseline scores in a given domain demonstrated greater gains in that domain. Greater daily device use ("datalogging") was associated with larger speech-recognition gains ( r =0.34, P <0.01) but not QOL improvements ( r =0.12, P =0.24). Borderline candidates (n=24) achieved QOL gains comparable to traditional candidates (n=77) despite smaller speech-recognition improvements.

conclusionsThe vast majority of CI recipients demonstrate meaningful improvements in speech recognition, QOL, or both domains. Baseline performance predicts domain-specific gains, and borderline candidates achieve meaningful QOL benefits despite smaller speech-recognition gains. These findings provide further support for incorporating patient-reported outcome measures into candidacy evaluations and postoperative assessments.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationQuality of LifeSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedCochlear ImplantsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAuditory rehabilitationCochlear implantCochlear implant candidacyHearing lossHearing-related quality of lifePatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeSpeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID42283203
PMCPMC13456571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.