Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283135›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

Mentorship Strategies for New Principal Investigators in Computational Chemistry.

Matheus Ferraz, Tarak Karmakar, Abdurrahman Olğaç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matheus FerrazNEC OncoImmunity AS, Oslo Cancer Cluster, Innovation Park, Ullernchausséen 64, 0379, Oslo, Norway.
Tarak KarmakarDepartment of Chemistry, Yardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas110016, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-6247
Abdurrahman OlğaçDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Yenimahalle06560, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-4942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational chemistry has become increasingly central across many sectors, from pharmaceuticals to materials science and beyond. For new principal investigators (PIs), the role extends far beyond technical expertise and includes assembling the right resources and deploying them effectively. Success depends in part on the ability to guide junior researchers with clarity and adaptability, including promoting critical thinking, encouraging collaboration, and cultivating open dialogue grounded in mutual respect. In particular, new PIs must navigate regulations, develop effective research strategies, build collaborations, and recruit emerging talent, while recognizing that each decision shapes outcomes at both the project and career level. In this Viewpoint, we offer insights into mentoring approaches for new PIs, drawing from experiences and observations across academia and industrial settings, with the aim of helping to build the next generation of research leaders.

Indexed as

Computational ChemistryMentoringMentorsResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID42283135
PMCPMC13471411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.