Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283080›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Benchmarking the Plasmon-Pole and Multipole Approximations in the Yambo Code Using the GW100 Data Set.

M Bonacci, D A Leon, N Spallanzani, E Molinari, D Varsano, A Ferretti, C Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M BonacciPSI Center for Scientific Computing, Theory and Data, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-0954
D A LeonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NO- Ås 1432, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2417-1002
N SpallanzaniIstituto Nanoscienze─CNR, S3, Via G. Campi 213/A, 41125 Modena, Italy.
E MolinariIstituto Nanoscienze─CNR, S3, Via G. Campi 213/A, 41125 Modena, Italy.
D VarsanoIstituto Nanoscienze─CNR, S3, Via G. Campi 213/A, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7675-7374
A FerrettiIstituto Nanoscienze─CNR, S3, Via G. Campi 213/A, 41125 Modena, Italy.
C CardosoIstituto Nanoscienze─CNR, S3, Via G. Campi 213/A, 41125 Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verification and validation of electronic structure codes are essential to ensure reliable and reproducible results in computational materials science. Besides the extensive work on density functional theory, in the field of many-body perturbation theory, the GW100 data set represents a key effort to benchmark and validate methods such as the GW approximation. In this work, we assess the numerical accuracy and convergence behavior of the GW implementation in the yambo code using both the Godby-Needs plasmon-pole model (GN-PPA) and the recently introduced multipole approximation (MPA). Quasiparticle energies are compared against GW100 reference data to evaluate the performance, numerical stability, and consistency of these approaches. Our results show that the GN-PPA approach is in very good agreement with full-frequency methods, further improved by the excellent agreement of the MPA scheme, especially when comparing with plane-wave codes.

Identifiers

PMID42283080
PMCPMC13374005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.