ReviewEuropean urology open science2026
Survival Outcomes of Patients with Treated vs Actively Surveilled Bosniak III or IV Kidney Cysts: A Systematic Review.
Review in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Bosniak III and IV kidney cysts have high malignancy rates, and treatment is often recommended. However, evidence suggests active surveillance (AS) may achieve similar cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). We systematically reviewed studies comparing AS and treatment outcomes for these cysts. Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies in English reporting CSS or OS outcomes for patients with Bosniak III or IV kidney cysts. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to provide a certainty of evidence summary. Per-study estimates were reported. Key findings and limitations: Five retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Across studies of Bosniak III cysts, 5-yr CSS was consistently >98% in both treated and AS cohorts, with several studies reporting no cancer-specific deaths among cases managed with AS. Studies of Bosniak IV cysts also had 5-yr CSS that exceeded 93% for both treatment strategies, including cohorts with 100% CSS in selected AS patients. OS was reported inconsistently and tended to be lower in AS cohorts with Bosniak III cysts, reflecting differences in baseline age, comorbidity burden, and competing causes of mortality rather than true differences in oncologic treatment. All studies were retrospective and nonrandomized, with moderate to high levels of selection bias and confounding. Conclusion and clinical implications: AS may be an appropriate management strategy for carefully selected patients with Bosniak III and IV cysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.