ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025
A Clinical Tutorial on Using a Concurrent Operant Analysis in the Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since its inception over four decades ago, numerous types and modifications to functional analysis (FA) have been published, likely in part to provide practitioners with a feasible, acceptable, safe, and ecologically valid assessment to inform the treatment of problem behavior. Even so, there are still cases in which an FA is not possible in a given setting or yields undifferentiated results, making conclusions from the FA difficult to interpret. Rather than relying on less rigorous and precise assessment methods (e.g., indirect reports) as part of the functional behavior assessment (FBA) process to inform treatment, a practitioner could employ a concurrent operant analysis (COA). A COA is an assessment that relies on direct observation and experimental manipulations that may be useful for supplementing the FBA process when an FA is not ideal or possible. Further, COAs may be beneficial in that they may avoid the potential drawbacks and criticisms (e.g., evoking problem behavior) that may be more likely associated with FAs than COAs. Despite the benefits of a COA, it has been slow to appear in research for the assessment and treatment of problem behavior. In this clinical tutorial, we provide a comprehensive, step-by-step description using hypothetical, illustrative examples, along with several resources to assist in developing, implementing, and analyzing a COA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.