Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283020›Full record

ArticleRadiology research and practice2026

Multicenter Study Suggests Unsupervised Learning Derived From MRI Identifies Prognostic Subgroups in Prostate Cancer Patients After Prostatectomy.

Guoqing Hu, Xiaofeng Liu, Zhangzhe Chen, Bingni Zhou, Hualei Gan, Ruchuan Chen, Liangping Zhou, Yajia Gu, Xiaohang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guoqing HuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-1783
Xiaofeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China, fjmu.edu.cn.
Zhangzhe ChenDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.
Bingni ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.
Hualei GanDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China, fudan.edu.cn.
Ruchuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-9746
Liangping ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7051-5868
Yajia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5577-0289
Xiaohang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, shca.org.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-2341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify subgroups of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features and evaluate the prognostic value in predicting 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Materials: Preoperative MRI and clinical data from 400 patients (185 with recurrence) were collected from three centers (one training and two external validation groups). Radiomics features were extracted from index lesions. PFS-associated clinical and radiomics features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox analysis. The K-means clustering method was used to identify subgroups and construct a Radiomic-Clinical model. PFS differences across subgroups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The predictive performance of the Radiomic-Clinical model was compared with the European Association of Urology (EAU), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and PIPEN models using the concordance index (C-index). Results: A total of 5 clinical and 13 radiomics features were selected, and three distinct prognostic subgroups were identified within the Radiomic-Clinical model. The Radiomic-Clinical model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with C-indices of 0.82 (training group), 0.78 (validation group 1), and 0.79 (validation group 2), outperforming the EAU (0.68, 0.70, and 0.65), CAPRA (0.71, 0.67, and 0.70), and PIPEN models (0.71, 0.70, and 0.68) ( Conclusion: Unsupervised learning using radiomics and clinical data effectively identifies distinct prognostic subgroups in PCa patients after RP, offering superior predictive performance over existing models for 5-year PFS.

Indexed as

progression-free survivalprostate cancerprostatectomyradiomicsunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42283020
PMCPMC13250766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.