ArticleRadiology research and practice2026
Multicenter Study Suggests Unsupervised Learning Derived From MRI Identifies Prognostic Subgroups in Prostate Cancer Patients After Prostatectomy.
Article in Radiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multicenter Study Suggests Unsupervised Learning Derived From MRI Identifies Prognostic Subgroups in Prostate Cancer Patients After Prostatectomy.Radiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify subgroups of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features and evaluate the prognostic value in predicting 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Materials: Preoperative MRI and clinical data from 400 patients (185 with recurrence) were collected from three centers (one training and two external validation groups). Radiomics features were extracted from index lesions. PFS-associated clinical and radiomics features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox analysis. The K-means clustering method was used to identify subgroups and construct a Radiomic-Clinical model. PFS differences across subgroups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The predictive performance of the Radiomic-Clinical model was compared with the European Association of Urology (EAU), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and PIPEN models using the concordance index (C-index). Results: A total of 5 clinical and 13 radiomics features were selected, and three distinct prognostic subgroups were identified within the Radiomic-Clinical model. The Radiomic-Clinical model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with C-indices of 0.82 (training group), 0.78 (validation group 1), and 0.79 (validation group 2), outperforming the EAU (0.68, 0.70, and 0.65), CAPRA (0.71, 0.67, and 0.70), and PIPEN models (0.71, 0.70, and 0.68) ( Conclusion: Unsupervised learning using radiomics and clinical data effectively identifies distinct prognostic subgroups in PCa patients after RP, offering superior predictive performance over existing models for 5-year PFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.