ArticleBMJ public health2026
Addressing the silent epidemic of antimicrobial resistance in the African region: a scoping review of evidence gaps and research considerations.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This scoping review mapped antimicrobial resistance (AMR)-related interventions in WHO African region against the five strategic objectives of the WHO Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR and identified evidence gaps limiting progress. Design: A scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, enhanced by Levac Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus searched on 9 December 2025, with grey literature from Google Scholar and Google (first 100 hits). Eligibility criteria: Studies of any design reporting interventions addressing GAP strategic objectives-stewardship, surveillance, infection prevention, education or economic approaches in the WHO African region. Data extraction and synthesis: Data were charted using a pilot-tested Excel tool by GAP strategic objective and evidence gaps and research considerations were synthesised thematically. Results: Forty-nine studies (2016-2025) were included, with country-specific evidence concentrated in South Africa, Ethiopia, Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria. Most evaluated antimicrobial stewardship or awareness/training interventions in tertiary hospitals, showing improvements in prescribing, knowledge and occasional cost savings but few assessed long-term effects or resistance trends. Surveillance had advanced but remained limited by weak laboratory capacity, diagnostic coverage, data quality and limited use of AMR/antimicrobial use data in practice. Evidence on infection prevention, vaccination and One Health interventions was scarce and no full economic evaluations were identified. Conclusions: AMR research in the African region clusters around antimicrobial stewardship and awareness in tertiary hospitals, leaving infection prevention, vaccination, One Health approaches and economic evaluation substantially underrepresented across the GAP framework. Closing these gaps will require longer-term implementation research, context-specific economic analyses and broader geographical coverage to generate the evidence needed to operationalise the global AMR research agenda in Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.