Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282971›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of linguistics2026

From Contact to Conversation: Protactile Language, Modality, and Community.

Deanna L Gagne, Hayley Broadway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of linguistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deanna L GagneDepartment of Linguistics, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Hayley BroadwayProtactile Kids (PT Kids) Lab, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Evaluating the rehabilitative potential of tactile number expressions for multisensory vision and hearing loss using wearable hapticsR01EY033761 · NEI · GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY · PI DEANNA GAGNE · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protactile language, a tactile language that has emerged within the DeafBlind community in the United States over the past two decades, challenges conventional assumptions about language, modality, and communication. Originating from a grassroots movement to center touch as a valid epistemology, protactile has developed distinct linguistic structures grounded in contact space, reciprocity, and embodied intersubjectivity. This article reviews the emergence and linguistic development of protactile, highlighting key structural innovations and areas of ongoing research. We discuss how protactile reconfigures foundational concepts such as phonology and interactional structure. We also present ethical considerations involved in studying a community-based language-emerging or otherwise-and emphasize the need for research practices grounded in collaboration and accountability. By centering the tactile experience and DeafBlind lived experiences, protactile contributes to a broader understanding of human language, how it functions, and how it emerges within diverse sensory and cultural ecologies.

Indexed as

DeafBlindlanguage emergencepositionalityprotactiletactile modalitytypology

Identifiers

PMID42282971
PMCPMC13251597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.