ArticleMethodsX2026
Enhancing grape disease detection: A comparative analysis of hybrid CNN-LSTM and CNN methods.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop disease detection is crucial for maintaining high agricultural productivity and minimizing the financial losses of farmers.•This study compares the performance of a hybrid method based on integrating the Long Short-Term Memory algorithm (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a standalone CNN method for grape crop disease detection and classification.•The proposed methods are trained and tested on a comprehensive balanced and imbalanced grape leaf dataset with 4000 and 4062 images, respectively. The imbalanced dataset has 423 images of the healthy class, 1383 of ESCA, 1076 of leaf blight, and 1180 images of the black rot class, while the balanced dataset has 1000 images in each class•The LSTM-CNN method achieved 100%, and the CNN method achieved 99.47% accuracy on the balanced dataset. Also, in the case of the imbalanced dataset, 100% and 97.89%, respectively.Among these two methods implemented, the proposed LSTM-CNN method has achieved excellent results in terms of performance metrics. This study presents a deep learning-based system for automated leaf disease classification. The model is designed for end-user deployment, where users can upload a leaf image and receive an immediate prediction of the disease without requiring model retraining or technical expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.