Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282902›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026

Outcome of an Extensive Mid-Root Perforation With Unintentional Bioceramic Extrusion: A Case Report With 2-Year Recall Using CBCT.

Laila S Almufleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laila S AlmuflehDepartment of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, psau.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-3838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic root perforation is a serious complication that can adversely influence the prognosis of endodontic treatment. Premixed bioceramic repair materials have emerged as promising alternatives to mineral trioxide aggregate because of their favorable handling characteristics, biocompatibility, and bioactivity. This case report describes the 2-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a large mid-root perforation repaired nonsurgically with a premixed bioceramic material despite significant unintended extrusion into the periradicular tissues. Case Report: A 34-year-old man developed an iatrogenic mid-root perforation in the middle third of the distal root of the mandibular left first molar during postspace preparation. The perforation was repaired immediately under magnification using a premixed tricalcium silicate-based material (Bio-C Repair). Postoperative imaging showed a well-condensed repair with extrusion of the material beyond the root surface. CBCT assessment demonstrated a perforation diameter of 3.5 mm and material extrusion of 3 mm into the periradicular area. At 24 months, the tooth was functional and asymptomatic, with no tenderness to percussion or palpation and normal periodontal probing depths. Periapical radiography and CBCT demonstrated complete healing of the previous periapical lesion and no evidence of furcal pathosis. Conclusion: Within the limitations of a single case report, nonsurgical repair of a large mid-root perforation with a premixed bioceramic material was associated with favorable clinical and radiographic healing, despite significant unintended material extrusion. This case supports the view that extrusion of bioceramic repair material does not necessarily preclude a favorable outcome.

Indexed as

bioceramic materialsBio-C repairCBCTiatrogenic perforationmid-root perforationroot perforation repair

Identifiers

PMID42282902
PMCPMC13250833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.