ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Integrated Signature of Multiple Indices for Preoperative Predictive Stratification of Endometrial Hyperplasia Subtypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a comprehensive predictive model incorporating multi-dimensional parameters for the accurate preoperative stratification of endometrial hyperplasia subtypes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 1822 patients with endometrial lesions. We gathered candidate variables spanning demographic, reproductive, hematological, hepatic and renal, coagulation, ultrasonographic, and pathological domains. Utilizing a two-step feature selection approach (variance thresholding combined with lasso regression), we constructed and compared three logistic regression models. Results: Sixteen key features were identified, encompassing pathological, clinical, and inflammatory indicators. Especially, the integrated model (Model 3) demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy, with an AUC of 0.923 (training set: sensitivity 87.2%, specificity 85.6%) and 0.905 (validation set: sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 83.2%), significantly outperforming the single-domain model. Conclusion: The predictive model, developed based on multidimensional clinical indicators, effectively categorized the preoperative subtypes of endometrial hyperplasia, thereby offering a practical tool for clinical decision-making and underscoring the pivotal role of inflammation in the progression of pathological lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.