ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Importance of placental evaluation in pregnancies at high risk for placenta accreta spectrum: Expert clinical perspective.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Placenta accreta spectrum care has moved beyond subspecialty identity: A call to refocus the field on individualized, expertise-driven systems of care.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Placenta accreta spectrum: From predictable risk to preventable crisis.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and peripartum hysterectomy. Rising cesarean delivery rates, advanced maternal age, and assisted reproductive technologies have increased its incidence. Early, standardized diagnosis is essential for multidisciplinary planning and improved outcomes, yet formal screening guidelines are lacking. Objective: To raise awareness of the importance of antenatal screening for PAS, summarize key clinical and imaging risk factors, and propose a standardized mid-trimester ultrasound protocol for high-risk patients. Methods: An expert panel convened under the Pan-American Society for the Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS2) reviewed available evidence, risk stratification models, and prior consensus statements to develop practical recommendations for PAS screening. Results: PAS risk rises with the number of prior cesarean deliveries, especially in the setting of concurrent placenta previa or anterior low-lying placenta. Combined transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound using grayscale and low-flow color Doppler (<10 cm/s) best identifies characteristic markers such as loss of the clear zone, myometrial thinning, bladder-wall interruption, placental bulge, uterovesical hypervascularity, lacunae, and bridging vessels. Standardized imaging protocols and structured reporting improve detection and facilitate referral to specialized centers. Conclusions: All patients with placenta previa or low-lying placenta and prior cesarean delivery should undergo targeted PAS screening at the time of anatomic survey. Early, systematic assessment and referral improve safety and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.