Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282828›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Equitable Health Intelligence: An Open Benchmark of Multi-Population Machine Learning for Omics-Based Cancer Prognosis.

Teena Sharma, Aarat Prasad Chopra, Laxita Agrawal, Nishchal K Verma, Athena Starlard-Davenport, Junling Wang, D Neil Hayes, Yan Cui

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Teena SharmaDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Aarat Prasad ChopraDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Laxita AgrawalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Nishchal K VermaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, U.P., India.
Athena Starlard-DavenportDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Junling WangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
D Neil HayesDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Yan CuiDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-6845

Funding

Algorithm-based prevention and reduction of differences in cancer outcomes arising from data imbalanceR01CA262296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI CUI, YAN · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Machine learning (ML) models for omics-based cancer prognosis are often trained on data from predominantly European-ancestry populations, producing biased predictions for other populations and undermining equitable genomic medicine. Existing fairness benchmarks mainly focus on outcome parity rather than predictive performance parity across populations. Public benchmark resources are needed for systematically detecting and mitigating such performance disparities in multi-population cancer prognosis. Methods: We developed Equitable Health Intelligence (EHI, https://ehiportal.org), an open-source benchmark of multi-population ML for omics-based cancer prognosis. EHI contains 1,475 ML tasks across 40 cancer/pan-cancer types, 4 omics feature sets, 4 clinical endpoints, 5 event-time thresholds, and 3 data-disadvantaged population (DDP) groups relative to a majority European Ancestry population group. Deep neural network models are trained under three multi-population ML schemes (Mixture, Independent, and Transfer Learning), with Naive Transfer included as a no-adaptation control, comprising a total of 10,325 ML experiments. Results: The EHI platform provides an interactive environment with visualization and exploratory tools for users to inspect predictive performance disparities between the majority European-ancestry group and data-disadvantaged populations, evaluate the extent to which transfer learning mitigates these disparities, and examine the impact of feature engineering methods across cancer types, omics features, and clinical endpoints. Conclusion: EHI is an open, interactive, and extensible benchmark for identifying and addressing performance disparities in multi-population ML for omics-based cancer prognosis. It provides a foundation for a growing ecosystem of methods targeting ML performance disparities arising from biomedical data inequality and population-level distribution shifts, thereby advancing equitable AI in precision oncology.

Identifiers

PMID42282828
PMCPMC13251932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.