ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Selective Activation of Nerve Fiber Subpopulations with Intrafascicular Stimulation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is most effective when specific nerve fiber subpopulations are activated, while minimizing off-target activation, which may cause undesirable side effects. This selectivity depends primarily on electrode design and charge delivery. We hypothesized that selective PNS could be achieved through electrode placement and intrafascicular electric field steering using Longitudinal Intrafascicular Electrodes (LIFEs). Methods: LIFEs were implanted into the tibial fascicle of the sciatic nerve of 17 anesthetized adult rats. We tested whether electrodes positioned at different cross-sectional and longitudinal locations within the same fascicle, together with different electric field-steering approaches produced distinct activation patterns in the gastrocnemius lateralis muscle. Muscle responses were measured using high-density epimysial electromyography (HD-eEMG). Results: Electrodes placed at different locations within the same fascicle activated distinct muscle regions, demonstrating intrafascicular selectivity. Bipolar stimulation recruited nerve fibers differently than monopolar stimulation, showing that electric field steering can further shape the selective recruitment. In both configurations, increasing the stimulation amplitude produced a graded increase in muscle activation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrated that HD-eEMG is an effective tool for evaluating intrafascicular selectivity. Conclusion: These findings suggest that improving on-target selectivity may support next-generation bioelectronic therapies with better outcomes and fewer side effects, potentially enabling more precise, organ-specific neuromodulation. Using multiple intrafascicular electrodes may provide two complementary strategies for enhancing selectivity: strategic intrafascicular placement to access different fiber subpopulations and bipolar configurations to steer recruitment beyond what a single electrode can achieve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.