ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Temporal coding expands the bandwidth of GPCR-mediated neuromodulation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of modern transcriptomic approaches has revealed a breadth of neuromodulatory G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) co-expression far exceeding what was previously thought. This raises a fundamental question about neuromodulatory system architecture because there is a much smaller number of available G protein transducers. Does this impose an information 'bottleneck', or can a single transducer pathway distinguish the effects of different neuromodulators? We addressed this question by focusing on four GPCRs that are natively co-expressed in essentially all hippocampal pyramidal neurons and that signal through the canonical Gs-coupled cyclic AMP (cAMP) cascade. We show that each GPCR produces a similar cAMP elevation upon acute activation but the effects observed at downstream steps diverge, to the point that the GPCRs differ dramatically in their ability to drive a transcriptional response. We also show that they differ in their ability to maintain functional responsiveness, with neuropeptide receptors remaining responsive for hours but monoamine receptors rapidly losing responsiveness. We conclude that the effective chemical bandwidth of cellular neuromodulation by GPCRs is not limited by the number of available transducers, and that there exists additional temporal coding which enables individual neurons to distinguish a richer neuromodulatory input.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.