Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282794›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.

Nathan Tardiff, Xingyu Ding, Xiao-Jing Wang, Clayton E Curtis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathan TardiffDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Xingyu DingCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Xiao-Jing WangCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Clayton E CurtisDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Funding

Putting Priority Map Theory to the TestR01EY016407 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CLAYTON E · 2006 to 2023
$5.8M
TRAINING IN VISUAL NEUROSCIENCET32EY007136 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI J ANTHONY MOVSHON · 1993 to 2026
$5.3M
The Nature of Working Memory RepresentationsR01EY033925 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CLAYTON E · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016407NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033925NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in working memory are associated with cognitive functioning and real-world outcomes, including general intelligence, academic achievement, and psychiatric and neurological disorders. Despite its importance, the neurobiological mechanisms that drive individual differences in working memory are unknown. Here, we asked whether the precision of spatial working memory covaries with the cortical surface area of retinotopically organized maps that are thought to store the content of working memory. In particular, we hypothesized that individuals with larger visual field maps would have more precise working memory. We assessed human subjects' (male and female) working memory precision using a memory-guided saccade task, and using fMRI we separately mapped retinotopically organized regions of visual, parietal, and frontal cortex. In support of our hypothesis, we found that people with larger maps in primary visual cortex and parietal cortex had better memory. To test hypotheses about the potential mechanisms driving our results, we simulated working memory in neural network models with varying numbers of synthetic neurons. Echoing our empirical results, larger networks exhibited less memory error. This reduction in error could be fully attributed to a decrease in the proportion of memory-perturbing noise along the attractor in larger networks, establishing a pure size effect on working memory precision.

Identifiers

PMID42282794
PMCPMC13251901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.