ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual differences in working memory are associated with cognitive functioning and real-world outcomes, including general intelligence, academic achievement, and psychiatric and neurological disorders. Despite its importance, the neurobiological mechanisms that drive individual differences in working memory are unknown. Here, we asked whether the precision of spatial working memory covaries with the cortical surface area of retinotopically organized maps that are thought to store the content of working memory. In particular, we hypothesized that individuals with larger visual field maps would have more precise working memory. We assessed human subjects' (male and female) working memory precision using a memory-guided saccade task, and using fMRI we separately mapped retinotopically organized regions of visual, parietal, and frontal cortex. In support of our hypothesis, we found that people with larger maps in primary visual cortex and parietal cortex had better memory. To test hypotheses about the potential mechanisms driving our results, we simulated working memory in neural network models with varying numbers of synthetic neurons. Echoing our empirical results, larger networks exhibited less memory error. This reduction in error could be fully attributed to a decrease in the proportion of memory-perturbing noise along the attractor in larger networks, establishing a pure size effect on working memory precision.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.