ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Ploidy shapes gemcitabine response through altered potency and delayed cell death.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor ploidy is increasingly recognized as a determinant of therapeutic response, but the mechanisms by which ploidy shapes sensitivity to specific cytotoxic agents remain unclear. Here, we investigated the relationship between ploidy and gemcitabine response using pharmacogenomic reanalysis, isogenic cancer cell systems, live-cell imaging, intracellular pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) measurements, and mathematical modeling. Across public pharmacogenomic datasets, gemcitabine emerged as a low-ploidy-selective cytotoxic agent. In matched isogenic low- and high-ploidy cell systems, higher-ploidy cells were consistently less sensitive to gemcitabine across multiple lineages. Focused live-cell imaging and PKPD measurements in near-diploid and near-tetraploid SUM-159 cells showed that both states formed intracellular dFdCTP, but high-ploidy cells exhibited weaker and slower treatment responses, with delayed accumulation of cell death. To quantify these differences, we developed a delay-aware live/dead model driven by intracellular dFdCTP exposure. The best-fit model identified both reduced effective gemcitabine potency and a substantially longer delay from intracellular drug action to observed death in high-ploidy cells. Specifically, the inferred mean delay was approximately 17.5 hours in near-diploid cells versus 42.5 hours in near-tetraploid cells. The model also supported a thresholded, nonlinear, and ploidy-dependent mapping from administered gemcitabine dose to effective intracellular drug action. Together, these results establish ploidy as a determinant of both the magnitude and timing of gemcitabine response and provide a quantitative framework for linking intracellular drug exposure to delayed cytotoxic outcomes across ploidy states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.