Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282758›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Ploidy shapes gemcitabine response through altered potency and delayed cell death.

Vural Tagal, Tao Li, Rikhil Kumar, Pujan Shrestha, Xiaoqing Yu, Daria Miroshnychenko, Kayode Olumoyin, Andriy Marusyk, Mark Davies, Stuart Maudsley and 5 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vural TagalH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Tao LiH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Rikhil KumarH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Pujan ShresthaTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Xiaoqing YuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Daria MiroshnychenkoH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6425-5000
Kayode OlumoyinH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-4351
Andriy MarusykH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Mark DaviesDepartment of Genetics and Oncology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Stuart MaudsleyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Issam El-NaqaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ana P GomesH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Derek R DuckettH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Hyo S HanH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Noemi AndorH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-5180

Funding

Characterizing cytotoxic therapy induced shifts in the cost-to-benefit ratio of high ploidyR37CA266727 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Noemi Andor · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
IMAT-ITCR Collaboration: Engineering model-based systems to monitor and steer subclonal dynamicsR21CA269415 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDOR, NOEMI · 2023 to 2024
$499k
A framework to integrate live-cell imaging with single-cell sequencing and learn how cells adapt to new environmentsR03CA259873 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDOR, NOEMI, HEISER, LAURA MADELINE · 2022 to 2023
$179k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA259873NCI NIH HHS R21 CA269415NCI NIH HHS R37 CA266727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor ploidy is increasingly recognized as a determinant of therapeutic response, but the mechanisms by which ploidy shapes sensitivity to specific cytotoxic agents remain unclear. Here, we investigated the relationship between ploidy and gemcitabine response using pharmacogenomic reanalysis, isogenic cancer cell systems, live-cell imaging, intracellular pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) measurements, and mathematical modeling. Across public pharmacogenomic datasets, gemcitabine emerged as a low-ploidy-selective cytotoxic agent. In matched isogenic low- and high-ploidy cell systems, higher-ploidy cells were consistently less sensitive to gemcitabine across multiple lineages. Focused live-cell imaging and PKPD measurements in near-diploid and near-tetraploid SUM-159 cells showed that both states formed intracellular dFdCTP, but high-ploidy cells exhibited weaker and slower treatment responses, with delayed accumulation of cell death. To quantify these differences, we developed a delay-aware live/dead model driven by intracellular dFdCTP exposure. The best-fit model identified both reduced effective gemcitabine potency and a substantially longer delay from intracellular drug action to observed death in high-ploidy cells. Specifically, the inferred mean delay was approximately 17.5 hours in near-diploid cells versus 42.5 hours in near-tetraploid cells. The model also supported a thresholded, nonlinear, and ploidy-dependent mapping from administered gemcitabine dose to effective intracellular drug action. Together, these results establish ploidy as a determinant of both the magnitude and timing of gemcitabine response and provide a quantitative framework for linking intracellular drug exposure to delayed cytotoxic outcomes across ploidy states.

Identifiers

PMID42282758
PMCPMC13251900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.