ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The HuBMAP Framework for Advancing Data FAIRness.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since publication of the FAIR Guiding Principles in 2016, the scientific community has increasingly sought to make experimental data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Operationalizing the FAIR principles in routine scientific workflows remains challenging without a standardized, workable infrastructure. With over 10,000 datasets from over 40 institutions, spanning more than 50 diverse assay types ranging from single-cell sequencing technologies to 2D and 3D spatial omics, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Human Bio-Molecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) consortium has been ideally situated to create a FAIR ecosystem. With the goal of achieving data "FAIRness," HuBMAP developed and implemented well-defined, community-endorsed metadata reporting standards across the research lifecycle. These reporting standards include detailed schemas, harmonized across a multitude of assays, that define the metadata associated with a dataset and the organization of the corresponding data files. These standards ensure documentation of the data collection process, of the data themselves, and of the manner in which the data are packaged for sharing, while remaining compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The use of these reporting standards, in tandem with technology to foster adherence, allows HuBMAP to fulfill its goal of generating FAIR data for open dissemination through its Data Portal and Human Reference Atlas. The procedures and simple workflow adopted by HuBMAP investigators serve as a model for other scientific communities aiming to maximize the value of varied datasets addressing a shared research question. The HuBMAP end-to-end, metadata-centered workflow has been replicated and enhanced by the NIH Cellular Senescence Network (SenNet) consortium and is readily available through open-source technology for others to utilize.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.