ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A foundational measure of the auditory system's ability to process sound correctly is the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle latency response (MLR) complex, but their dependence on stimulus complexity and behavioral relevance is poorly understood. Here we recorded noninvasive, simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in adults listening to both naturalistic speech and clicks, and computed the resulting temporal response functions (TRFs). The TRF's ABR-MLR complex for speech listening contains a very early cortical peak (11 ms latency), which has not been well-characterized, and is absent for click stimuli. Other significant differences in latency and source between the speech and click MLR complexes point to further differences in their auditory processing, in thalamus and cortex. In contrast, the speech and click TRF's ABR complex both share a similar, prominent wave V response. In summation, the use of naturalistic speech reveals how early auditory responses reflect its ethological relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.